Ahmadinejad upset with Obama for ‘interfering’ in Iranian affairs

From Fox News:

Iran President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad called on President Obama on Thursday not to interfere in Iranian affairs after the U.S. president said he was “appalled and outraged” by post-election violence, a news agency reported.

“Mr. Obama made a mistake to say those things … our question is why he fell into this trap and said things that previously (former U.S. President George W.) Bush used to say,” the semi-official Fars News Agency quoted Ahmadinejad as saying.

“Do you want to speak (with Iran) with this tone? If that is your stance then what is left to talk about,” said Ahmadinejad. “I hope you avoid interfering in Iran’s affairs and express your regret in a way that the Iranian nation is informed of it.”

I consider all of this to be faux outrage, as it’s hard to believe Ahmadinejad really thought Obama would continue to stay silent as the Basij kept murdering Iranian citizens. Not that he didn’t want to, (four days of silence before his first strong public statement against the regime proves that) but the public outcry for him to condemn the Iranian regime got to such a fever pitch that he felt he had no choice but to do so.

Another reason I believe it to be faux outrage is that he knew the one person Obama wouldn’t want to be associated with was George W. Bush, and yet he chose to do just that. It was as if he was attempting to guilt the president into reversing his position and apologizing for condemning the regime. Nice try, Mahmoud.

Another way in which Ahmadi attempted to foist guilt upon the president was by saying, “If that is your stance then what is left to talk about?” What is he, five? Grow up. Did he really think Obama would respond to that comment by panicking and apologizing for interfering? I hope by now that Obama realizes he was never going to be able to negotitate with Khamenei anyway. If he doesn’t, that’s another issue. But there’s no way Obama’s going to backtrack on condemning the murderous regime. He would have to be a fool to do so.

Advertisements

One Response to Ahmadinejad upset with Obama for ‘interfering’ in Iranian affairs

  1. Georgina says:

    Even though Obama is not interfering, the leaders of Iran are using anything the West say and twisting it to their benefit.

    There are more articles on Obama’s reaction to Iran here:

    http://politicsknowledge.co.uk/index.php/americanpolitics/98-obama-avoids-interfering-in-iran

    http://politicsknowledge.co.uk/index.php/americanpolitics/104-obama-criticizes-irans-qiron-fistq-yet-still-fails-to-threaten-with-consequences

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: